2006特纳奖相关资料

161 主题	0 好友	2745 积分

论坛游民

不靠谱

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

发消息

电梯直达

1^#

发表于 2007-8-4 13:38:54 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="4" width="97%" align="center" style="TABLE-LAYOUT: fixed; WORD-WRAP: break-word;"><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#fffbff"><div id="user1"><div id="user2"></div></div></td><td align="right" bgcolor="#fffbff"></td></tr></tbody></table></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" background="image/wind/line.gif" bgcolor="#fffbff" colspan="3" height="1" style="BACKGROUND-REPEAT: repeat-x;"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" bgcolor="#fffbff" colspan="3"><br/><span class="tpc_content"><p>    <a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/"><img height="37" alt="" src="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/images/tp2006_title.jpg" width="370" align="left" border="0" p="100" h="37" w="370"/></a><br/>      </p><p></p><p></p><div><h3>About</h3></div><p>This exhibition presents recent and new work by the four shortlisted artists: Tomma Abts, Phil Collins, Mark Titchner and Rebecca Warren. <table style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 7px;"><tbody><tr><td valign="top"><a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/tommaabts.htm"><img height="140" alt="" src="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/images/main_tommabts.jpg" width="111" border="0"/></a><br/><span>Tomma Abts<br/><em>Ert</em>, 2003 <br/>Courtesy greengrassi, London </span></td><td valign="top"><a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/philcollins.htm"><img height="140" alt="" src="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/images/main_philcollins.jpg" width="145" border="0" p="100" h="140" w="145"/></a><br/><span>

hil Collins <br/><em>Shady Lane Productions</em>, 2006<br/>

hoto © Tate 2006 </span></td><td valign="top"><a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/marktitchner.htm"><img height="140" alt="" src="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/images/main_marktitchner.jpg" width="140" border="0" p="100" h="140" w="140"/></a><br/><span>Mark Titchner<br/><em>How To Change Behaviour (Tiny Masters Of The World Come Out)</em>, 2006<br/>

hoto © Tate 2006 </span></td><td valign="top"><a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/rebeccawarren.htm"><img height="140" alt="" src="http://www.tate.org.uk/britain/turnerprize/2006/images/main_rebeccawarren.jpg" width="112" border="0"/></a><br/><span>Rebecca Warren<br/>Turner Prize installation, 2006<br/>Photo © Tate 2006 </span></td></tr></tbody></table></p><p>With the support of Gordon\'s ® gin this year\'s prize fund is £40,000 with £25,000 going to the winner and £5,000 each for the other shortlisted artists. The Prize, established in 1984, is awarded to <strong>a British artist under fifty for an outstanding exhibition or other presentation of their work in the twelve months preceding 9 May 2006</strong>. It is intended to promote public discussion of new developments in contemporary British art and is widely recognised as one of the most important and prestigious awards for the visual arts in Europe. </p><p>Work by the shortlisted artists will be shown in an exhibition at Tate Britain beginning on <strong>3 October 2006</strong>. The winner will be announced at Tate Britain on <strong>4 December</strong> during a live broadcast by Channel 4. </p><p>The members of the Turner Prize 2006 jury are:<br/><strong>Lynn Barber</strong>, writer, <em>The Observer</em><br/><strong>Margot Heller</strong>, Director, South London Gallery<br/><strong>Matthew Higgs</strong>, Director and Chief Curator, White Columns, New York<br/><strong>Andrew Renton</strong>, writer and Director of Curating, Goldsmiths College<br/><strong>Nicholas Serota</strong>, Director, Tate and Chairman of the Jury<br/></p><p>The Turner Prize 2006 is supported by the makers of Gordon\'s gin, who this year are extending the sponsorship by supporting Late at Tate Britain. Late at Tate Britain is the series of free events held on the first Friday of each month providing the perfect opportunity to explore art after hours, allowing visitors to enjoy exhibitions, performances, music, talks and films.</p><p></p><p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><strong><font size="1"><img alt="shows a picture of people looking in through a window made through a wall in the Tate Gallery" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4325.JPG"/></font></strong></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Phil Collins - frontrunner with his show within a show? © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p><i>24 Hour Museum Editor Jon Pratty casts his critical eye over this year\'s Turner Prize nominees and even makes a prediction for the winner...</i><br/>            </p><p>Four artists are fighting it out for the 2006 Turner Prize. Two on the shortlist, Tomma Abts and Rebecca Warren apparently work in traditional ways, with paint and clay. </p><p>The other two, Mark Titchner and Phil Collins, are right on the edge of the possible and the accepted, both by the art establishment and by audiences. But do all of these artists deceive? </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>Make your own mind up - work by the short listed artists is on show in the Turner Prize exhibition, on now at Tate Britain until January 14 2007. The big decision on the winner of the £25,000 main prize will be announced live on Channel 4 on December 4. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Tomma Abts, Teete, 2003, Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh. © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="painting shows a geometric pattern motif" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4319.JPG"/></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>German-born Tomma Abts makes intense densely-worked paintings that are always 48 X 38 cm. She insists the paintings hang together in precisely worked out relationships – it’s work that is more of an installation than an exhibition of paintings in the traditional sense. </p><p>So Abts, while on the face of it another abstract painter, is constructing quite new layers of meaning about the way paintings are made, and how they hang in relation to each other. Her works grow very slowly out of blank canvases, developing and materialising out of some unseen clues in the canvas, the pigment and the space around the picture. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows people looking at small paintings on a gallery wall" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4322.JPG"/></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Abts\' paintings always carefully relate to each other in the exhibition space © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>The paintings themselves don’t repay much study at first – they’re precise, hard-edged, closely-toned images with a distinctive palette. </p><p>They look like hard fought paintings, but unlike say, Auerbach (who also reworked paintings massively over long timescales) there’s a sense that Abts is obsessive about controlling the final pleasure the viewer gets from the picture. They were not, for me, particularly joyful or sensual works. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Rebecca Warren © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows a messy but form filled sculpture made from clay" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4321.JPG"/></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>Rebecca Warren takes a lot of inspiration from the traditional giants of art and sculpture – Degas, Rodin and Picasso to name but three. But Warren’s distorted and morphed figures only suggest for momentary glimpses the original inspiration – once you stand next to one of her messy, sensual and seemingly chaotic pieces, something weird happens. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows a figure cast in bronze that has echoes of classical sculptures by Degas" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4320.JPG"/></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Rebecca Warren © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>You start to sense echoes of Degas, of Rodin. These are not quotes, not replicas of moments discovered around the haunches of a Degas bronze, but cartoonish explosions of impressionistic, plastic delight. There’s lots of humour here – and Warren admits to finding the provocative American humourist Robert Crumb interesting. </p><p>Degas’ Little Dancer Aged Fourteen (1880-81) was a particular influence for Warren and it’s an eery feeling walking round these bronzes and clay originals and catching sudden glimpses of the distantly remembered Degas perennial. </p><p>Both these artists are clearly less conventional than they seem at first glance and Warren’s work in particular seemed to me to be loaded with multiple meanings, pleasures and possibilities. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Mark Titchner © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows a sculptural construction in front of a large painting on a wall" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4326.JPG"/></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>In contrast, Mark Titchner’s extraordinary kinetic and conceptual constructions challenge not just your eyeballs and sense of cultural good taste, they actually challenge your perception of the truth. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows kinetic sculptures which look like small windmills, but with strange circular forms rotating instead of blades" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4327.JPG"/></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Mark Titchner, Ergo Ergot, 2006. © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>At the Tate press launch we were told that Titchner “attempts to harness man’s psyche using ‘Psyonics’ and ‘Radionic boxes,’ which we are asked to believe are an early form of radio. </p><p>As someone with a more than a basic grounding in science theory, my antenna beeped an alert as curator Lizzie Carey-Thomas explained further, “What Titchner is doing is questioning belief systems. It’s about people having a different relationship with art.”</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Mark Titchner, from How to Change Behaviour (Tiny Masters of the World Come Out) 2006, commissioned by Arnolfini, Bristol © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows what appear to be car batteries with letters on them, and wires connecting them." src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4329.JPG"/></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>Quite. So what we have here is not just really compelling sculptural assemblage and bold, exciting poster-like imagery: in addition Titchner is plugging into a long tradition of work, honourably explored in a mischievous way by legend/icon/liar Joseph Beuys. </p><p>What we see here may be true – if you choose to take your philosophy and theosophy uncritically from an artist. Otherwise you – like me – may find this colourful and rewarding work exciting, perplexing and worthy of time spent decoding myth from truth, lie from real insight. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows a man on a video screen, with another screen behind him, and a man in the background" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4323.JPG"/></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Phil Collins, The return of the real / gercerin geri donusu, 2005. Colour video with sound, courtesy Kerlin Gallery, Tanya Bonakdar Gallery © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>At the core of the Turner Prize 2006 show is a complex nest of realities. In a way, the work of Phil Collins shares common ground with the shifting truths and realities of Titchner. </p><p>They both subvert reality – Titchner by presenting us with seeming plausible statements and machines that are on thin ice in reality; Collins by presenting us with multimedia visions that on second viewing peel apart, like the layers of an onion skin, revealing more veneers of reality and unreality below. </p><p>So in one piece, from a Biennial in Turkey, Collins presents on two opposing screens the interviewer and the interviewed. The subject is a hapless individual who ended up revealing far more than he intended on a Big Brother style TV show. His interviewer is also seen on the other screen, and in the background Collins himself flits into view briefly, a Hitchcock-style presence, a sort of ghost in the mechanism of the piece. </p><p>Collins’ work often plays with these layers of presentation, reality, and disintegration of the picture and the subject. Truly revealing this way of working, his epic production at the centre of the Turner show consists of a real TV production suite. Real media workers are based here and they are making a show about people whose lives have been changed by their participation in a Big Brother style show. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p class="unjustified">Phil Collins, Shady Lane productions 2006. TV production and research company established at Tate Britain. © Jon Pratty / 24 Hour Museum</p></div></td><td valign="top" align="left" width="252"><img alt="shows a group of people in an office, working at desks" src="http://www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/content/images/2006_4324.JPG"/></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>Of course, the irony here is that the production itself is the subject of the show. We are invited by Collins to witness the building of a cultural property and to see the complex layers of reality as they are actually constructed and applied to an art piece – in this case a real TV programme. </p><p>Many of us feel confronted by the mirror that Big Brother holds up to us as a society, and Collins is making his work about these facets of us that we often find repugnant. </p><p>This work positions itself bravely at the epicentre of our new digital cultural reality, asks questions about where the reality is, and in my opinion Collins deserves the Turner Prize for his bold, topical, ambitious and ingenious statement. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" width="390" border="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" width="100%"><div class="chunk"><p>This year’s jury include Lynn Barber of the Observer, Margot Heller of the South London Gallery and Nicolas Serota, Director of Tate. </p></div></td></tr></tbody></table></p></span></td></tr></tbody></table>

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-17 23:44:18编辑过]